Emmy says:
A great fun trip down memory lane revisiting this film. I enjoy the songs and story and it always makes me smile. The beautifully staged look of the sets makes me nostalgic for the theatre. 8/10.

Jeff says:
Well, they certainly don’t make musicals like that anymore! While a newer production than the original 1962 film, this adaptation of the 1957 musical still manages to feel like it came from the start of the 20th century by way of the 50s in a very similar way to Singin’ in the Rain. Some things haven’t aged well, but others remain timeless. The story is silly but the songs are memorable, if not always sensible (I’m looking at you, Shipoopi!) 8/10.

IMDb

Emmy says:
This look at the First Indochina War from a singular perspective is a marvellously faceted story. The ill fitting costumes of Thomas Fowler and initially lazy disposition to his work elucidated the character in this dialogue heavy film wonderfully. The journey of Thomas from a bystander to contributor is complex and internal, and completely engaging. 10/10.

Jeff says:
Graham Greene’s book is brilliantly brought to life by Phillip Noyce with outstanding performances from Michael Caine and Brendan Fraser. I thought this was a spy thriller, and while espionage is involved it is not really the point of the story. At the heart is a love triangle that mirrors the tensions that were going on in Vietnam at the time. The depth to the story is kept in the film and filming in Vietnam made the visuals more poignant. 10/10.

IMDb

Emmy says:
An absolutely gripping character driven story filled with brilliant actors. Loved the use of the compact sets and the camera motion to show the underwater movement. The seamless transitions between Russian and English are expertly crafted to show the shift of understanding. The only disappointing part was the extremely obvious green screen scene at the end. 9/10.

Jeff says:
Once again, thanks to Patrick (H) Willems for putting this on our sonar … although it took a while to finally get around to watching it. I have all the original Jack Ryan novels, and watched all the movies that were made from them. I love the stories, and this movie (despite Sean Connery not even trying to sound anything other than himself) is excellent. The cast is full of “hey! it’s that guy!” actors doing outstanding work as usual. The direction and cinematography were impressive for how long ago this was made. Very rewatchable. 9/10.

IMDb

Emmy says: A compelling story of personal honour and justice. Sorkin did a great job writing this intriguing plot and it made good use of his verbose style. The actors did brilliantly in their roles and it’s easy to see why the TV show JAG was successful after this. 9/10.

Jeff says: One of the classics, and an excellent example of Aaron Sorkin’s writing, probably helped Donald P. Bellisario get the TV series JAG idea taken seriously three years later. Excellent characters and dialogue – much of it so quotable that even people who haven’t seen the film know lines from it. 8/10.

IMDb

Emmy says: Oh wow! This movie looks so gorgeous and gritty, I’m astounded at how well it combines the two. The characters are bold and brought to life by a slew of top shelf actors. The gangster aesthetic of the characters and cars is wonderfully merged with a comic book style. This movie is crazy and great fun to watch. Definitely going to revisit this when our intern is old enough to understand it. 9/10.

Jeff says: Thanks to Patrick (H) Willems we revisited Dick Tracy. The colours and style are fantastic, the acting is bonkers for a PG film, the cast list is incredible, the songs are memorable. Fun and entertaining, it brings the funny pages to life 15 years before Sin City or 300. Not sure what to say that isn’t said better by Patrick, so go watch the movie and then Patrick’s video. 9/10.

IMDb

(also known as Renaissance Man)

Emmy says:
A seriously delightful film. Carried by the dialogue and the actors spectacularly, the simple setting of the army allows the story to come forward. Great dissection of Hamlet, which gives access to Shakespeare for both the students in the film and the audience. 9/10.

Jeff says:
I love, and have always loved, this film. The gimmick of “Shakespeare for dummies” is brilliant, but it’s the background of the characters and the development of their relationships that is truly amazing. I have to wonder what the original idea for the film was – a fish out of water tail, or a character study about why some people join the army and the system failures that lead to some seeing it as their only option? Or is it merely a tale about the power of the right teacher with the right tools to reach you? This film is all of those things, and more. Victory starts here. 10/10.

IMDb

Emmy says:
Loved the 80s outfits. Felt uncomfortable watching most of the characters. The opening sequence and the combat was wonderful, apart from the aerial combat at the end looked off. I don’t appreciate the resolution to all of the characters. In all I’m conflicted. 7/10.

Jeff says:
I don’t understand this movie. Don’t get me wrong – the plot was predictable, the resolution obvious, the visual effects were stunning. What I struggle with is all the whys. Why was it set in the 80s? Why does Wonder Woman turn into Spiderman, Thor and Superman in quick succession? Why does the obvious “we all have to do better” final act leave me bored, and why does it take so long? Why are there so many sequences where I’m left wondering if I missed something (a transition)? Why was there no direct payoff to the opening flashback? I have looked forward to this film since the end of the last one, before this film was even an idea. I’m sad that this is what it ended up being: so many missed opportunities. 6/10.

IMDb

Emmy says:
I’m not sure how I feel about this movie yet. I know I didn’t like any of the characters and felt a bit like I was watching a train wreck. The filming, directing and editing were stunning for the content, and I stayed for the end only to see how it concluded. Wanting to know that must mean it’s not a bad movie, but the characters were so well acted that I didn’t enjoy watching them. 5/10.

Jeff says:
This movie is … a lot. A lot of swearing, a lot of yelling, a lot of dumb decisions by many different characters, and a lot of time spent with very unlikeable people. The acting, however, is top notch. I don’t know that I’m on board the “Adam Sandler’s best role ever” bandwagon, but he was a force in this film. Given the background to how this story came to be, I understand the decisions made in telling this tale, but it was still a lot to take and I’m not sure I could actually recommend it to others. 7/10.

IMDb

Emmy says:
This movie delivers a tightly shot fervid spree of revenge, with very few extraneous scenes. Entertaining with the well choreographed combat and its predictable plot. 7/10.

Jeff says:
Decent story, although somewhat predictable. I did like that there was an in-story reason for her new-found ability to take a lot of damage – something a lot of revenge stories tend to forget. Good effects, and Jennifer Garner is always good in action. 7/10.

IMDb

Emmy says:
Revisiting a movie from my childhood I am pleased to see it entertaining as an adult. The spectacle, costumes, music and premise hold up well. 8/10.

Jeff says:
I can still quote more than 50% of this movie, which says a lot. It’s still fun watching a young Jim Carrey when the schtick was funny and not worn-out. The soundtrack has always been the draw for me, and it still is. Interesting fact: when this came out it was the second highest grossing film based on a comic ever … after the 1978 Superman film. Not hard to see why. 9/10.

IMDb